Search for: "Dunkin v. Dunkin "
Results 1 - 20
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
Tingley has ordered Dunkin’ Brands Canada Ltd. to pay plaintiffs $16.4 million in damages and costs — exactly what was claimed by the franchisees.In his ruling in Bertico Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:41 am
” Tags: hot coffee, Prop 65 Related posts Archived food and beverage posts, pre-July 2003 (1) Yet another McDonald’s coffee style lawsuit (5) Yes, tea is hot, too: Zeynep Inanli v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 2:08 pm
Dunkin Donuts, Inc.. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:47 am
Grazette v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:37 am
If a franchisee allegedly breaches its agreement such that Dunkin terminates the license, and the licensee continues to use the trademarks, then in addition to any contractual claims, there may be trademark claims as well: Dunkin Donuts v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 5:03 pm
Elkhatib v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:39 pm
Chen v. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:35 pm
Defendants in the litigation are Dunkin’ Brands, Inc. and Dunkin’ Donuts Franchised Restaurants LLC of Canton, Massachusetts. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 2:23 pm
” The defense compared the facts in Dunkins’ case to that of Carpenter v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 3:00 am
Dunkin:... [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 9:06 am
In Bertico Inc, et al. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:42 pm
In Chufen Chen v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 11:19 am
As co-blogger Bob V explains:"Medicare drug donut hole to close in 2020 as part of Obamacare. [read post]
NYAG Proposed Settlement for Credential Stuffing Attacks with 3-Business-Day Access Request Response
23 Sep 2020, 5:40 am
(New York v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 9:54 am
Hoey v. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 7:03 am
In 2003, a Dunkin Donuts franchisee in Massachusetts implemented a no-tipping policy at certain of its stores. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
The case is Thomas Estler, et al., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:00 pm
Corp., et al., v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 4:01 am
The case is JZ Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 8:41 am
(Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
